
What’s the common denominator in all of this? Trust, or the lack thereof
Finding our place at the table
And now, with the world in greater confusion and distress (economy, wars, fascism, annexation, global reordering, tariffs, income inequality, misinformation, disinformation, wildfires, AI…), how does the environmental movement find its place amidst this quagmire? Research says environment has dropped in priority despite Canadians attesting to its continued importance. Even Mark Carney, who came to power with a sustainability conscience has subordinated those values for economic and trade priorities. I don’t blame him since he reports to the great Canadian electorate, and more immediate threats are on the horizon. But we need to view this not as an ‘or’ (economy or environment) but as an ‘and’ (economy and environment). And this is where the sustainability movement has failed (hey, David said that too) but it’s time we rectified it.
Realigning Nature with people
There has been a great decoupling of Nature from humanity (perhaps with the exception of Indigenous peoples). Most people view Nature is out over there – a 60-minute drive from the City where a forest or an ocean might appear, not here in our immediate vicinity where most of us live. Even environmentalists have that attitude. But the reality is Nature is here with you right now.
Everything in your immediate surroundings comes from Nature. Everything.
As humans we’ve just shaped, cut, fired, dried, glued, pressed, soldered, and processed these materials (ingeniously I might add) into products we use in the controlled environments in which we live. The air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat all come from Nature. But this value-added step in between has convinced us that these physical articles have been separated from Nature, physically and psychologically. That glistening filet of salmon packaged in a white Styrofoam tray, clad in clear stretched plastic, and placed in matching arrays in a temperature-controlled refrigeration unit, that’s a product! And it’s going to be delicious. But that sockeye salmon your brother pulled from the Fraser River, bloodily killed, and descaled and gutted dockside, well that doesn’t seem to be as appetizing, does it? It’s the same product but marketing has decoupled them in ways nefarious. I can say this because I’m a marketer.
It’s not just a communications challenge, it’s a systems challenge
So, getting back to my point — we are at an inflection. And it’s more than a communications challenge, it’s a systems change that perhaps we’ve failed to recognize. It’s time the environmental movement changed its perspective and work with the system than against it. I am not suggesting at all giving up environmental values, after all that’s what gives us (and yes, I consider myself part of the movement) our strength, integrity, and will to fight. I’m suggesting that while environmentalists think the environment is the only thing, our audience thinks it’s just one other thing. It’s not what we want to hear but hearing that, and accepting it, will begin to reshape how we get our message across with the greatest resonance and effectiveness. We’ve come this far with nary a movement in the needle so what do we have to lose? So, what do I propose?
Reach people where they’re at
Tell better stories –
Humanity is based on stories. They are the glue that holds us together and helps us make sense of the world. I dare say the environmental movement has been lacking on this front opting to confront audiences with facts that shock and awe. Better, tell stories that connect environmental issues and facts with people’s daily lives or cultural sensibilities. People don’t remember facts but they remember stories. Importantly, stories are engaging with a through-line triggering the brain with cause and effect structures that reinforces understanding. But perhaps most importantly, stories trigger emotions and we all know that emotional responses are what inspire action whether that action is buying a product agreeing to protect the environment and Nature.


Attitude change –
Remind and convince people that they are Nature, not separate from it. This is a monumental task but we must start. That decoupling, along with human exceptionalism (eg. We can colonize Mars!), has instilled us with God-like features but bringing humanity back to Earth is crucial. It might take 50 years, but we must start and keep this message consistent, frequent, and heard. Recently, Canada celebrated 50 years since the conversion to the Metric system and 50 years later, most of us still can’t express our height in centimetres but we can quite readily tell temperature. That five-decade time horizon gives us a measure to how we might think about how long attitude change takes. The best time to have started this conversion was 50 years ago. The second-best time is now.
Context, context, context –
Most people don’t understand the environment. They just take for granted it’s there to provide when they need it without fully grasping that Nature is declining and may not be such a willing resource soon. It’s another problem no one wants to hear amongst all the other concerns plaguing them – job, children, tonight’s dinner, next month’s vacation… Understanding this context allows us to reframe the conversation. Remember what I said about Nature being one more thing? Let’s make sure that one-more-thing is put on the agenda but done in a way that respects and understands all those other things, lest we come across as shrill or preachy. The actor Michael Caine talks about ‘using the difficulty’ where problems can be reset as opportunities. During a stage play, a chair was thrown in front of Caine preventing him from entering the room. The director said, ‘use the difficulty’. If it’s a comedy trip over the chair, if it’s a drama, smash the chair but above all, use the difficulty to your advantage given the context. The postscript to this point is Nature’s plight is not an environmental issue; it’s a social issue. Thus, if people are to play a role in the environment’s well-being, understanding their situation and using their difficulty(s) could be the difference in creating an army of converts rather than unsympathetics.


Stop saying stop –
Negativity and scorched Earth communications tend to be a hallmark of the environmental movement. But in a world rife with negativity, more of it just doesn’t compute. The mantra of ‘stop fossil fuels’ or ‘stop the wolf cull’ or ‘stop LNG’ begins with negativity but often don’t follow up with solutions or alternative ways of thinking. It’s just stop, full-stop. How often have you admonished your teenager to stop doing something only to find she tunes out, or worse, it reinforces her resolve to continue that behaviour? It’s a self-defeating effect. Rather, flipping the narrative may be instructive by starting with what the solution is followed by the why. This non-lecturing stance would likely find better reception and acceptance. Do we as environmentalists want to go further? Yes, of course – to get our points across with profundity because surely there’s a global urgency here. But given where we’re at, it’s more important to be effective and pounding people against the head is sure to create nothing but a headache. Instead of ‘no more fossil fuels’ consider, ‘1.5 hours of sunshine upon the Earth is enough to meet the world’s energy demands for a year. So why fossil fuels?’ Admittedly, the second statement is longer (anathema for most copywriters) but the point is more important.
There is much more to say on this topic but suffice to say, a reframing is necessary, and it must be enacted now. Nature and environmentalists are not the bad guys or even the bearers of bad news. Sure, the situation is dire, but we cannot pontificate ourselves out of this mess. Many will say the opposite of death is life. But I subscribe to the idea that the opposite of death is hope for without hope we have nothing to live for. Love to hear your thoughts on this.
Many will say the opposite of death is life. But I subscribe to the idea that the opposite of death is hope for without hope we have nothing to live for.
Love to hear your thoughts on this.